Skip to main content

Different Types of Oncologists and Their Specialties in Cancer Care

Oncology is the specialized branch of medicine devoted to the research, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. Like many other health conditions, there are different types of cancer, which leads to further specialization in the field of oncology to reflect the various medical procedures used in cancer treatment.

This blog explores the different types of oncologists to help you understand whom to see when you need care based on your diagnosis and treatment plan as part of the oncology care model.

Surgical Oncologist

There are three types of oncologists. The first one is the surgical oncologist, who specializes in the surgical removal of cancerous tumors. Surgical oncologists also perform specific types of biopsies, which are necessary in the diagnosis of cancer.

Radiation Oncologist

Another type of oncologist, radiation oncologist, specializes in treating cancer using radiation therapy. This treatment method uses high-energy X-rays to destroy cancerous cells. Sometimes, these high-energy X-rays can fail to destroy these cancer cells, and a radiation oncologist will use them to reduce or slow down the growth of tumors without affecting other healthy tissues around the area. Other radiotherapy interventions entail implanting radioactive sources directly into the tumor or in areas close to it.

Medical Oncologist

Medical oncologists are part of the three main divisions in the field of oncology. A medical oncologist specializes in using chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy to treat cancer.

In the field of oncology, medical oncologists count as the primary care providers for cancer patients. This role sees them take the lead in the development of cancer patients’ treatment while also working in conjunction with other medical doctors to provide patients with the best results.

A medical oncologist is also the head who continues to follow up on cancer patients’ treatment, do checkups, and provide post-treatment care.

Additional Oncology Sub-Specialties

Besides the three major subdivisions of oncology discussed above, there are sub-specialist types of oncologists, including the following:

  • Gynecologic Oncologist: Gynecologic oncologists diagnose and treat cancers related to the female reproductive system. They specialize in different types of cancer, such as ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancer.
  • Hematologist-Oncologist: Hematologist-oncologists are specialists in the field of oncology who treat blood cancers, such as multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia.
  • Neuro-Oncologist: A neuro-oncologist specializes in treating cancers related to the spine, peripheral nerves, and the brain.
  • Pediatric Oncologist: A pediatric oncologist treats cancers that affect young children, including leukemia, brain tumors, Ewing’s sarcoma, and osteosarcoma.

Partner With Oncology Practices to Drive Performance

Guideway Care is your one-stop destination for any healthcare institution seeking to achieve the best results in cancer treatment and care. Our approach integrates oncology care models, ensuring that we address both clinical and non-clinical barriers to improve patient outcomes. Contact us today and find out how we can partner with you in the field of oncology.

The Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Care: A Comprehensive Guide

In the evolving field of cancer care, “What are patient-reported outcome measures?” has become a pivotal question. These measures offer a unique lens through which both healthcare providers and patients can view the effectiveness of treatments. This article aims to shed light on the importance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer care, how they are measured, and their benefits.

What Are Patient-Reported Outcomes?

Patient-reported outcomes are self-reported measures that focus on a patient’s health condition without any external bias. They differ from clinical metrics and are collected through standardized questionnaires. So, what is a patient-reported outcome measure? It’s a tool used to gauge these self-reports, often focusing on quality of life, symptom burden, and overall well-being.

Why Are They Crucial in Cancer Care?

When it comes to cancer care, patient-reported outcomes benefits are manifold. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in cancer care has been shown to improve not only the quality of life but also patient satisfaction. Studies indicate that these outcomes can be prognostic of survival in cancer patients. They serve as an independent predictor of overall survival and, in some instances, treatment response. Therefore, patient-reported outcome measures are a necessity in modern cancer care, not just a question.

Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes

There are validated and non-validated tools for measuring these outcomes. Validated tools like the NIH’s Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) are often used. For a deeper understanding of how these measures are utilized in cancer care, you can delve into learning how to measure quality in cancer care.

Challenges and Solutions

While these measures offer numerous benefits, they come with their set of challenges. These include choosing the right measure, the mode of administration, and data interpretation. However, with ongoing research and standardization efforts, these challenges are being addressed.

The Role of Guideway Care in Patient-Reported Outcomes

Guideway Care plays a significant role in implementing patient-reported outcomes in cancer care. With a focus on patient-centered approaches, Guideway Care is at the forefront of enabling healthcare providers to utilize these measures to improve the quality of life for cancer patients.

Time for Action: Why You Should Consider Patient-Reported Outcomes Today

In conclusion, patient-reported outcomes are not just buzzwords but essential components of cancer care. They offer a more holistic view of a patient’s health, thereby aiding in better treatment plans. For more information on how these measures can revolutionize oncology practices, visit Guideway Care’s Oncology Practices.

Maximizing the Value of AI in Comprehensive Cancer Care

In the ever-evolving medical field, one of the most promising advancements is the integration of AI in oncology care. This technology is not merely a supplementary tool; it’s a game-changer with the potential to revolutionize how we approach cancer treatment. This article aims to shed light on the importance of AI in cancer care and how it can be maximized for better patient outcomes.

The Data Spectrum in Oncology

Traditionally, oncology relied heavily on clinical trials and medical records. However, the advent of artificial intelligence in cancer treatment has opened doors to a more dynamic form of data collection. Real-time patient-reported outcomes are now being considered as valuable data points. These outcomes offer insights into the patient’s experience outside clinical settings, filling a critical gap in existing AI in oncology models.

The Role of Machine Learning in Symptom Monitoring

Machine learning algorithms are particularly useful in symptom monitoring. A study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that enhanced symptom monitoring led to better clinical outcomes. This is where AI in cancer treatment shines, as it allows for the collection of continuous data, enhancing predictive capabilities. For instance, machine learning (ML) can predict how a patient might react to a specific treatment based on historical data and real-time feedback.

Timely Interventions: The Key to Success

One of the most crucial aspects of cancer treatment is timing. The sooner an adverse event is detected, the quicker it can be managed. AI in oncology care enables clinicians to monitor various metrics in real-time, allowing for prompt interventions. This is particularly important given the toxic nature of treatments like chemotherapy and radiation.

The Future: Personalized Treatment Plans

The ultimate goal is to offer personalized treatment plans for cancer patients. AI and ML technologies are making this a reality by providing comprehensive views of each patient’s treatment plan and symptom development. These platforms transform data input into automated alerts, sending messages to care teams when interventions are required.

Maximize Your Care Strategy with Guideway Care

As we look towards the future, it’s clear that maximizing the value of AI in cancer care is not just a possibility but a necessity. Companies like Guideway Care are at the forefront of this revolution, offering solutions that provide real-time data and actionable insights.

Take Immediate Steps for Enhanced Cancer Care

The integration of AI in oncology isn’t just a fleeting trend; it’s a transformative approach that’s here to stay. For those looking to optimize their care strategies, Guideway Care’s oncology practicesoffer cutting-edge solutions that harness the full potential of AI for superior patient outcomes.

Mandatory Bundled Payments on the Horizon

Requiring APMs Necessary to Test Efficacy and Spur Reform, Azar Says

There are continuing indications that mandatory alternative payment models (APMS), including mandatory bundled payments, are coming. During remarks to the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) on September 6, 2018, Alex Azar, secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), stated, “We need strategies and models that provide better care at a lower price…in some cases that’s going to mean mandatory models from CMMI and other mandatory reforms.”

Continuing Signals for APMs, Including Mandatory Bundled Payments

In November 2017, prior to Azar’s confirmation as secretary, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) canceled two mandatory bundled payment models that were scheduled to begin January 1, 2018, which some interpreted as a pivot towards voluntary models. During Azar’s confirmation hearings in January, however, Azar clearly stated his belief that mandatory APMs may be necessary in order to test the efficacy of those programs. During his recent comments to PTAC, Azar doubled down on the need for mandatory models, saying, “Requiring participation can be necessary to determine whether a model really works, but it may also be necessary to meet what we see as an urgent need for reform.”

CMS Administrator Seema Verma noted that forthcoming models will be focused on high-cost areas such as end-stage renal disease, cancer care, chronic disease and other serious medical conditions.

Two-Sided Risk Part of Overall Strategy

In addition to discussing the need for mandatory models, Azar also touched on the recent proposal by CMS to overhaul the accountable care organization (ACO) Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP). The proposed changes would move providers into a risk-bearing model more quickly, regarding which Azar said, “…the best results we’ve seen have been in ACOs that took on two-sided risk—where providers have real accountability for outcomes…that’s why we have now proposed to simplify the ACO system into two tracks, requiring them to take on risk sooner.”

For providers, the message is clear—CMS is committed to advancing value-based care through alternative payment models, and mandatory models with two-sided risk are part of that strategy. Mandatory bundled payments are on the horizon, and providers should start laying the groundwork now in order to succeed under these programs.